[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA SC] Another perspective on the AGA "Forum" proposal
- To: aga-sc@thekrib.com
- Subject: Re: [AGA SC] Another perspective on the AGA "Forum" proposal
- From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Apr 2004 19:17:19 -0500
- Organization: Aquatic Gardeners Association
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
I understand. But I just don't accept that as a strong reason *not* to have
forums. I know we are all a little gunshy still, but we should not let the
jerks of this world make our business decisions for us. Maybe that's naive.
More likely stubborn.
I don't know what I said before, when James first proposed this, but I
would now support a forum and would help to manage it any way I could.
Cheryl
Karen Randall wrote:
The biggest problem from my perspective is the potential liability. A
public forum and a law suit like Novak could put us completely out of
business.
That's over and above any and all logistical and political concerns.
Karen
--
Cheryl Rogers, Membership
Aquatic Gardeners Association
http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com
with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message.
Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc
When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".