Same with me -- got the batch of TAG's last week and have not gotten the single issue yet. David ----- Original Message ----- From: "Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 3:31 PM Subject: Re: [AGA SC] TAG Mailing > Hi Cheryl, > > Another tidbit of information you may find interesting... I received my > bundle of TAG's on Friday... (still haven't rec'd the single copy I get for > tracking purposes) and it came PRIORITY. Looks to me like she was hurrying > to cover her behind. > > Karen > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@wilstream.com> > To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> > Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 8:10 AM > Subject: [AGA SC] TAG Mailing > > > > Just to bring you guys up to speed, I was suspicious about the length of > > time it was taking for TAG to hit the mailboxes since we've been using the > > new mailer. I took my recent envelope to the post office and they said it > > was standard bulk, not first class. > > > > So I researched all my e-mails back-and-forth with Robin of Complete Mail > > Services. I was crystal clear on my requests for three quotes that we > > wanted first class mail. I also remembered a phone conversation with her > > when the last TAG took so long, wherein I asked her bluntly if they had > > been sent first class, and she said yes. > > > > I went to her small office in the booming metropolis of Lake Dallas, TX > > (Home of "Roadies'"). Her first response was that she had been out of the > > office and her part-time help had inkjetted the envelopes. This I believe, > > because she was out of town just as the journals were ready. BUT it does > > not explain the last TAG. What I really think happened is that *she* made > > the "mistake" with TAG 17-1 and then her part-time help, instructed to do > > it just like last time, faithfully followed orders. Two other points > > leading to my suspicion: 1) She says she has a copy mailed to herself and > > didn't notice the postmark. Twice? 2) She has a postage account with the > > post office and also didn't notice that she had more money in it that was > > warranted for our mailing? Twice? Hmmmph. > > > > She has offered to make good on the difference. She is researching both > > TAGs and says she will get back to me no later than Monday afternoon. > > Depending on what she says and how I feel about it, I may just ask her to > > cut us a refund check and be done with her, or I may ask her to credit us > > for postage on next TAG's mailing. > > > > I am truly miffed. I hate it when I am responsible for something and it > > doesn't go well. I *really* hate being ripped off. > > > > -- > > Cheryl Rogers, Membership > > Aquatic Gardeners Association > > http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org > > > > ------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > > > > > ------------------ > To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com > with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. > Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc > When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp". > > ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@thekrib.com with "unsubscribe aga-sc" in the body of the message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-sc When asked, log in as username is "aga-sc", and password "incorp".