Re: [AGA-sc] [Fwd: AGA/sfbaaps cooperation]

["Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>]

Which is $1,120 per year.

I think it is extremely important that we NOT burden TAG by further reducing
content pages without a reasonable return.  As I see it, TAG is the biggest
reason that MOST of our members are members.  I'd be very reluctant to water
it down further.  We reduced our page number to go to color, and I agreed
that was a reasonable trade-off.  But now it's time to build TAG back up
again.  I have great, quality material... and no space to run it.

Karen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@wilstream.com>
To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] [Fwd: AGA/sfbaaps cooperation]


> An extra sheet (four more magazines pages) would cost an additional $280
> per issue.
>
> Cheryl
>
> S. Hieber wrote:
> > So, one question is, will the additional membership revenue
> > from the project bring in enough money to cover 4 or 5
> > additional pages? Cheryl, do you know what additonal pages
> > might cost.
> >
> > sh
>
> -- 
> Cheryl Rogers, Membership
> Aquatic Gardeners Association
> http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>


_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc