I agree! On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, Karen Randall wrote:
Which is $1,120 per year. I think it is extremely important that we NOT burden TAG by further reducing content pages without a reasonable return. As I see it, TAG is the biggest reason that MOST of our members are members. I'd be very reluctant to water it down further. We reduced our page number to go to color, and I agreed that was a reasonable trade-off. But now it's time to build TAG back up again. I have great, quality material... and no space to run it. Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@wilstream.com> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:57 AM Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] [Fwd: AGA/sfbaaps cooperation]An extra sheet (four more magazines pages) would cost an additional $280 per issue. Cheryl S. Hieber wrote:So, one question is, will the additional membership revenue from the project bring in enough money to cover 4 or 5 additional pages? Cheryl, do you know what additonal pages might cost. sh-- Cheryl Rogers, Membership Aquatic Gardeners Association http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc