[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: [AGA-sc] Re: [AGA-mcm] Web Site



He told me they are at 600 and he can do 800 but "that's in
the future"

sh
--- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:

> Jay can definitely upload bigger pictures.  I think it's
> his choice of 
> making them small.
> 
> I've never kept the old pictures around for longer than a
> year.  Didn't 
> really think it was that important as they weren't a
> critical part of the 
> AGA site, just sort of a "fun" temporal thing...and not
> really well sorted 
> (of course I think they are worse-sorted this year...
> i.e., left as "by 
> person" rather than mixed together for each category...
> that was actually 
> the only difficult work I did last year, merging in all
> the timelines 
> for 4 different photographers and trying to pick the
> best).
> 
>    - Erik
> 
> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, S. Hieber wrote:
> 
> > I need to here from Erik. If he still has the pages and
> > they just aren't linked -- and all he has to do is turn
> > them back on, then that's a good reason to do it that
> way,
> > to jsut turn them back on.
> >
> > Anyway, I want to ask Jay if there isn't a way to make
> the
> > pics in the gallery bigger.
> >
> > sh
> > --- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote:
> >
> >> Oh, I wasn't suggesting changing what Jay did with the
> >> 2004 pix.  I don't
> >> think that would be fair to him.  But I hate that you
> >> can't see them at a
> >> large enough size to, well, SEE them.
> >>
> >> I just don't want him to get his hands on the old
> stuff
> >> that worked better,
> >> and make it worse.  (and I THINK there were pix there
> >> from as long ago as
> >> the first Amano year... maybe further back)
> >>
> >> The problem is, finding a tactful way of saying, "Oh,
> >> don't bother putting
> >> all that work into making them worse."<g>
> >>
> >> I am fairly sure that the reason there is no link to
> them
> >> at the moment has
> >> nothing to do with the fact that Jay hasn't set them
> up
> >> in his "gallery"
> >> style.
> >>
> >> Karen
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
> >> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board"
> >> <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 5:02 PM
> >> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Re: [AGA-mcm] Web Site
> >>
> >>
> >>> Well, we could take another poll  ;-)
> >>>
> >>> or
> >>>
> >>> we could put the old convention pics back up the way
> >> they
> >>> were and then show counter with more hits on the old
> >> pics
> >>> than the 2004 pics. ;-)
> >>>
> >>> or
> >>>
> >>> we can just leave it for a while and eventually
> change
> >> it
> >>> (more work for Erik)
> >>>
> >>> or
> >>>
> >>> just leave 2004 as it is and put the old pics back
> (my
> >>> pref).
> >>>
> >>> I don't think the gallery is awful, even though it's
> >> not my
> >>> style -- it's so, so *forumish*.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> We had more than just AGA2K3 before, didn't we? I
> don't
> >>> know if I'd put the old pics up as part of this
> >> gallery. I
> >>> like the old way better too, so I would not want to
> >> change
> >>> the other photos, but I doubt it's worth the pains
> and
> >> hard
> >>> feelings to change the 2004 gallery.
> >>>
> >>> So that's my shadow vote. But I leave it to Erik's
> >>> aesthetic sensibilities -- besides, it'd be work for
> >> him,
> >>> votin's easy.
> >>>
> >>> sh
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Sorry to jump lists again, but... I think the old
> >> version
> >>>> was WAY better
> >>>> than the new one.  How do we deal with THAT?!?!<g>
> >>>>
> >>>> Karen
> >>>>
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>> From: "jay luto" <jayluto@hotmail.com>
> >>>> To: <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 2:49 PM
> >>>> Subject: RE: [AGA-mcm] Web Site
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Erik,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can link me to "old" pictures and I will be
> >> more
> >>>> than happy to upload
> >>>>> them to AGA Gallery as - AGA 2003 - event.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Jay Luto
> >>>>> www.greenstouch.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> From: "Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>
> >>>>>> Reply-To: AGA Advisory Committee
> >> <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
> >>>>>> To: "AGA Advisory Committee" <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
> >>>>>> Subject: [AGA-mcm] Web Site
> >>>>>> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 14:23:32 -0500
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Erik,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Roger Miller just mentioned over on APC that there
> >> is
> >>>> no longer a link on
> >>>>>> the web site to the earlier convention photos.  Is
> >>>> this on purpose?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Karen
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> AGA-mcm mailing list
> >>>>>> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> >>>>>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> AGA-mcm mailing list
> >>>>> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> >>>>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> AGA-sc mailing list
> >>>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> >>>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> AGA-sc mailing list
> >>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> >>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> AGA-sc mailing list
> >> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> >> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-sc mailing list
> > AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> >
> 
> -- 
> Erik Olson
> erik at thekrib dot com
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> 

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc