Re: [AGA-sc] Proposal Doc to Barr

["Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>]

Since Cheryl is already on it, I'm going to wait intil I see her changes
before going through again myself.  I'm betting she'll find the same things
I did. ;-)

Then I can get back to TAG, which isn't going to get to Cheryl as early as I
hoped it would.

Karen
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Proposal Doc to Barr


> If you're asking me, I think doing it in Word is fine. I
> haven't had any trouble with the doc. I can load it in Word
> or Word perf or in my browser and I don't get anything that
> would be a formatting problem. Heaven help me if things go
> screwy later but that's the risk one takes with MS
> applications.
>
> Be sure to turn on TRACKING CHANGES, so we can keep track
> of the, well, changes and who made them. IT could get
> confusing down the road.
>
> Waiting is okay with me. Tom understand that it might take
> a few days for the Board to do this ;-)
>
> The doc in it's current form is not well organized, imo,
> but I wanted to get it in front of you folks with the added
> content in the interest of time (The whole Tom thing hadn't
> come up yet) and worrying about form and organization can
> come later if once the content is settled.
>
>
> sh
> --- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't know if you'll consider this good news or bad
> > news, but I am
> > editing the doc. I have many questions and changes.
> >
> > Last year I was so tired I couldn't even bring myself to
> > thoroughly read
> > it. But I know more about what is going on now and I have
> > minor changes and
> > major questions.
> >
> > Do you think that modifying the word doc is the best way
> > to get these
> > changes to you?
> >
> > I think we should wait.
> >
> > Cheryl
> >
> > S. Hieber wrote:
> > > Since Tom wants a proposal Requirements & guidelines
> > doc,
> > > I'dhate to send the old version if we can send a newer
> > one.
> > >
> > > You folks think we'll have comments within a few days
> > on
> > > the dreaded Word document?
> > >
> > > OR
> > >
> > > You do you think the draft looks good enough to send to
> > Tom
> > > with the caveat that it's subject to some changes?
> > >
> > > OR would you rather wait. . .
> > >
> > > Btw, I don't know what Word is doing to mess up the
> > > formatting. I've cleaned as much of the formatting as I
> > > could get my hands on, but unlike Wrodperf, you can't
> > get
> > > Word to actually reveal and give you access to all the
> > > formatting codes it buries in the text.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm open to ideas to try to make the doc easier to use
> > by
> > > others.
> > >
> > > sh
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > AGA-sc mailing list
> > > AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -- 
> > Cheryl Rogers, Membership
> > Aquatic Gardeners Association
> > http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-sc mailing list
> > AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>


_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc