[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] Dave & PAM
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Dave & PAM
- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:27:06 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=wxt4Fh2v7QWCThYGpCF0rU4L1DvCfUJPRF81Gj4YPIEbN/8gNIq+/eho+mvG/lgjt20iXpAAsMyTo/Fl/D/GA5Ekxef5vB3FxQ3mSglLCvufzNc4ldFtkVF6byfHzazR3MPgR0MIHSrZ5Fbck/e73SeNtWiM3PhDXufiig90H9E= ;
Are there any other lifetime members?
sh
--- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote:
> Dave called me tonight and we talked about PAM. As I
> suspected, more than
> anything else, he's looking for another pat on the back.
>
> I explained that he BOD was a little gun-shy because we
> had lost so much on
> the PAM deal (though I also made appropriate noises about
> how we understood
> how much money he lost also) and did not want to
> "negotiate" on whether PAM
> could be included on the DVD's or not... He was either OK
> with it, or he
> wasn't.
>
> He said he didn't want much, just a token rememberance.
> He started in with
> some complicated Dave-type "deal", and I said that, no,
> we just weren't
> going to get into that sort of thing. The bottom line is
> that I am quite
> sure that if I have the board's approval to put Dave
> permanently on the AGA
> membership list, I can get him to turn over all rights to
> PAM. I think in
> the long run, it would be worth it. How do the rest of
> you feel?
>
> Karen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc