I don't have a problem opening it up for a beta test prior to the formal forum opening, but I think this is going to have to come from Phil. In my opinion we need to let the Forum and it's leadership steer the direction unless it needs some pushing. Rather than a unified board directive like how much we are spending on the software which is contained in the original proposal this idea is really not covered. Therefore I think this suggestion should come from the individuals, ie. Cheryl and Scott so that the Forum leadership can decide. I realize it's a fine line but I think we need to let the forum become its own entity at least to a degree and the board (Not board members) should only be involved when needed. The individual board members of course should have as much input as they feel warranted. Just my thoughts.... Larry --- "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> wrote: > It's one way to get it a bit populated for opening > *and* > they aren't likely to post a lot of really horrible, > nasty, > no-good, can't stand them, hateful stuff about us if > they > are still considering submitting a convention-host > proposal. > > And they are a pretty active group. Do we have any > party > favors to offer? > > sh > > --- Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com> wrote: > > > How about, since they know about it anyway, a few > days > > before the > > official opening of the forums, we invite SFBAAPS > for a > > Sneak Preview > > Party? Say on a weekday night, everybody come, > check it > > out, make > > suggestions, etc. > > > > Make their "mistake" into an invitation to a > special > > event.... > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc