Re: [AGA-sc] Re: [AGA-conheads] More on Hotels, deadlines

[Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com>]

> 
> I think that for next year (2007) we should change
> the language to either 
> REQUIRE a draft November 1st of the previous year,
> with a preliminary 
> hotel contract.
> 
> Just look at how Michael and SFBAAPS have
> interpreted our request for a 
> draft... as though it's optional, and they don't
> need to submit anything 
> until February 10th (or 18th).  No way.  We need to
> know in November if 
> this club is going to deliver.
> 
> It's too late to do it for this year, but I really
> think we should fix up 
> the docs as soon as the SFBAAPS thing is finalized
> (or not).
> 
> Comments?  Additions?  Counter-proposal?
> 

I agree we need to know by November. In fact if this
does not work we need to work on our own AGA run AGA
and have our ducks in a row by Jan. 

Yeah, we probably need to change the verbage in the
contract document to reflect that we need a proposal
and hotel contract by Nov 1.

The problem I don't have an answer for is the fact
that by the time they have a hotel contract in hand we
have all put in so much of our and the potential host
clubs time that we all feel like we have a level of
committment. 

As we are all painfully aware, it takes so long to
educate somebody on all of the variables that need to
be anticipated in order to assure viability of the
hotel. This requires some further thought but I don't
even know if there is a better solution given the lack
of national convention experience in our segment of
the hobby.

Larry


>    - Erik
> 
> PS: Larry, thanks for volunteering to help in the
> negotiation!
> 
> -- 
> Erik Olson
> erik at thekrib dot com
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> 

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc