[AGA-sc] Fwd: Re: [AGA-conheads] Updated AGA 2006 Program / Budget proposals

["S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>]

Should we suggest the arrangement we made with DFWAPC for
the AGA to underwrite risks so SFBAAPS can inlcude it in
their proposal?

We can probably do this convention with reasonably small
risk. Low probability events (like no air travel,
earthquake, etc.) but one of those could zonk us for
whatever the maximum gurantee is to the hotel. So if we
underwrite the risks, we should get something for them.

sh
--- jiml1029@aol.com wrote:

> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:50:37 -0500
> From: jiml1029@aol.com
> Subject: Re: [AGA-conheads] Updated AGA 2006 Program /
> Budget proposals
> To: aga-conheads@thekrib.com
> 
>  
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: S. Hieber <shieber@yahoo.com>
> To: Convention Planning <aga-conheads@thekrib.com>
> Sent: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:17:05 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: Re: Fwd: [AGA-conheads] Updated AGA 2006 Program
> / Budget proposals
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- jiml1029@aol.com wrote:
> 
> > >> Scott, 
> > >>I think your email brings up some critical points ...


> > I guess we will find out pretty soom what kind of
> > deposit the hotel will need. SFBAAPS group funds are
> not
> > very significant, we will need to dicuss how this would
> > get covered.
> 
> I guess then, we also need to discuss how the risks of
> losses would be shared.
> 

_______________________________________________
aga-conheads mailing list
aga-conheads@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-conheads

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc