[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] Fwd: Re: [AGA-conheads] Updated AGA 2006 Program / Budget proposals
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Fwd: Re: [AGA-conheads] Updated AGA 2006 Program / Budget proposals
- From: Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:32:47 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SxqLvTzxRp2wBlUZTD3moGeqTN80TWpRBzEvuI+wU/+EGUAWA/Br7p3jtZdtElq1YfxbHPiTt7xTGtZ43tfix/ov2XorjENYSdWoRQCD0uvz1JxUFyANjKe5eMNsrsiJlnmr1E6YxP/nEHGPl22lTzEOpBgPMI3m1wp46DWeQPE= ;
I don't recall the exact terms of our DFWAPC/AGA
agreement can you refresh my memory?
Thanks,
Larry
--- "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Should we suggest the arrangement we made with
> DFWAPC for
> the AGA to underwrite risks so SFBAAPS can inlcude
> it in
> their proposal?
>
> We can probably do this convention with reasonably
> small
> risk. Low probability events (like no air travel,
> earthquake, etc.) but one of those could zonk us for
> whatever the maximum gurantee is to the hotel. So if
> we
> underwrite the risks, we should get something for
> them.
>
> sh
> --- jiml1029@aol.com wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:50:37 -0500
> > From: jiml1029@aol.com
> > Subject: Re: [AGA-conheads] Updated AGA 2006
> Program /
> > Budget proposals
> > To: aga-conheads@thekrib.com
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: S. Hieber <shieber@yahoo.com>
> > To: Convention Planning <aga-conheads@thekrib.com>
> > Sent: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:17:05 -0800 (PST)
> > Subject: Re: Fwd: [AGA-conheads] Updated AGA 2006
> Program
> > / Budget proposals
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- jiml1029@aol.com wrote:
> >
> > > >> Scott,
> > > >>I think your email brings up some critical
> points ...
>
>
> > > I guess we will find out pretty soom what kind
> of
> > > deposit the hotel will need. SFBAAPS group funds
> are
> > not
> > > very significant, we will need to dicuss how
> this would
> > > get covered.
> >
> > I guess then, we also need to discuss how the
> risks of
> > losses would be shared.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> aga-conheads mailing list
> aga-conheads@thekrib.com
>
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-conheads
> > _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc