I don't know who first thought of it but I was thinking of it as a change in how we do business for future conventions -- a revamp of the whole document. Of course, the nature of the document changes if we change what we want a local club to do. If we're taking controlk, the document will read very diff in places ;-) --- Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com> wrote: > Yeah no doubt about it. We need to give them all the > info but in little bittee bite size chunks with a very > specific due date. > Accountability as you said is the key here. I like the > idea that you or EO brought up about > fill-in-the-blanks with some essays. That way they > can't claim ignorance...well they can but it won't > work. > > > > > --- "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Oh, whther it's in there or not, let's list whatever > > we > > want them to provide, soit's clear what wwe aasked > > for and > > by when. Firts rule of accountability, what's to be > > done > > and by when, right? > > > > > > --- Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > . . . > > > Although these are all in the formal proposal doc > > I > > > believe. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > AGA-sc mailing list > > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > > > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc