Re: [AGA-sc] tag and TAG

["Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>]

> I'll stop bringing it up -- I was think of one or annual really big 
> pics -- maybe the annual contest layout or something.

I know what you were thinking, but I'd much rather have us stick with one 
format or the other.  We could look into an Aqualog-type format, though... 
Those would be cheaper to mail, but still have more room for larger photos.

I don't do the layout, but my guess is that a larger format would actually 
give Cheryl a lot more freedom in terms of layout.  I don't even think we'd 
need a lot more material.  (we don't believe in no stinkin' "white space" in 
it's current form... there is simply no space for those niceties<g>)  I _do_ 
think it would be more work switching back & forth between formats.  And I'm 
not sure we'd want to waste a whole lot of real estate on material that is 
available to everyone on the website anyway.


> But I guess I could turn my thinking away from Big TAG towards an 
> occassional Fat TAG, which should fit on your shelf nicely. Whether it 
> fits yours and
> Cheryl's  schedules is an entirely diff matter. Just another idea from 
> someone offering ideas without labor.

Fat TAG's are no big problem as long as we stick to what ever page count can 
be handled with the form of binding we currently use.

Karen



_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc