Re: [AGA-sc] opinions on speakers for convention?

[Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com>]

--- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote:

> > That could give him 3 diff tanks to shoot although
> the water might be 
> > cloudy or any of the three to choose form. It's
> live; it's inpredictable. 
> > It could be exciting.
> 
> But people really wouldn't be able to experience
> much in the way of success. 
> I think that's a bad idea. (though those tanks could
> certainly also be used 
> as "practice tanks".

What if we pushed the Iron Aquascaper up to Fri night.
Then the three tanks will have overnight to clear.
Perhaps a sfbaas could bring a diatom just to make
sure. They should be ready for say a Sat aft on
evening photo talk by then.
> 
> > I was thinking that discussions about speakers
> should have involved us 
> > more when SF was doing it.
> 
> I think, at that time, we thought that SF was
> actually planning on RUNNING a 
> convention, and didn't want to be percieved as
> "taking over".  Now it is 
> clear that the only way this is going to happen is
> if we guide things a 
> little more directly.
> 
> Karen 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> 

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc