Oops. Sorry. I DID read it. I just forgot to write back about it...First, as I told you on the phone, I love the new color scheme. I wouldn't have thought of it, but it works beautifully.
Page 7, photo on the top left is sideways. (shd be a vertical format) There is another version of this same shot (Datz-3-04-Silv.Het.Crenicichla) that is horizontal in format, AND shows the fish that Scott couldn't see in the low rez version much more clearly.
Page 10, The article was first published in Datz 03, 2004.Pg. 18, use your judgement... I can't tell whether the flower inset really is blurry or just low rez in the proof.
Page 20, The Rotala photo... I told Cavan that we could clone out the little root in the upper left corner that looks like it is attached to the leaves. I forgot to do it... can you fix it?
22-23 spread, The shading from the lettersmakes my eyes go wonky. I don't know why it works on the cover, in color, but doesn't work here in white on black. I also am not sure whether it's because it's low rez or not. So use your judgement, and if it doesn't bother you, Scott or Erik, leave it that way. But it makes me keep blinking, and pulls my eye away from the photos.
Pg. 26, let's NOT use LBJ's abdomen... I don't think MY stomache could take it.
Pg. 27. LOVE the photo treatment... VERY classy. Othere thatn those comments (added to Scott's) I think it's in great shape!----- Original Message ----- From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@wilstream.com>
To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 12:24 PM Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Prelim 2005 Data
Oh, good. Since you have nothing to do, you can read the latest pdf of TAG and make any changes. I would like this to go to press Monday. All else is ready.Cheryl Karen Randall wrote:I take it you're snowed in today too?<g> Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com> To: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2006 11:01 AM Subject: [AGA-sc] Prelim 2005 DataThis is very preliminary data so don't bet the store on it. Paypal won't do download of more than a few months without timing out so it took a while to get the data and I'm still working on it.In 2005 we several times almost got up to $50G.Net change in cash assets (money) was $10,851 on a total income of$34,779 and total expenses of $23,928.Balance of cash assets in all accounts on 12/31/05 was 48,588Note that this includes $2,480.54 in net revenue funds from AGA2K4 which hit the books in 2005. I'm just doing simple Cash Basis accounting, not Accrual accounting. Given that the convention funds are included, I do not think these are atypical results for AGA.there were a few other out of the ordinary ups and downs (ACA, Tshirt clearance, Tropica sellout, etc.) and I'll try to address these in my 2005 report. But since it's aready midFebruary, I figured you deserved hear at least the barest financial info.One way to look at this is that we are clearly in the black and clear enough annually to produce almost 2 issues of TAG. Another way is that we cleared enough to pay wage and benefits for a clerical worker for about 1.5-3 months, depending on medical and dental.sh _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
_______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc