On Fri, 31 Mar 2006, S. Hieber wrote:
In the past we've always let host club membership suffice. Is that no so?
If you remember, we had a bit of an issue with the GWAPA members because
they were significantly cheaper than AGA membership, and we had to insist
that prior GWAPA members were grandfathered in but new GWAPA memberships
didn't count. Or was that DFWAPC? Naw, I think it was GWAPA.
SFBAAPS membership is FREE. You just have to be a Bay Area resident. They
currently have 200 of these free members. So basically if one went by
that rule, all local residents would get in without additional membership
fees. But in typical SFBAAPS fashion, I suspect they are not aware of
this tradition.
I just don't know how gracious we're feeling right now.
1. We could not tell them, and let the bomb explode when all the
free-loadin' locals figure out they not only have to pay registration, but
an additional $20, or
2. We could formalize the agreement to include SFBAAPS memberships,
meaning that all locals would get in at $59.
If it were just up to me, I don't have the energy for that particular
fight, so I'd go for #2, knowing it's our last time having to make this
arrangement.
- Erik
--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc