Re: [AGA-sc] Convention fri nite

[Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>]

On Sat, 1 Apr 2006, S. Hieber wrote:

> Otoh, I wouldn't feel bad making them at least pay $20 since they've 
> done so little work.

Right, that's the logic that skews me in that direction (well, that and 
Cheryl's bit about the Premie membership... but frankly, I don't think any 
of the ten are really even thinking about the convention fee).

> So I drafted up an agreement -- see attached. Comments anyone?

First off, I don't think SFBAAPS is a legal entity, so I'm not sure what 
the agreement would accomplish legally to begin with.  Second, it seems 
that most of SFBAAPS is blissfully unaware about what's going on with the 
convention anyway, so I'm not sure the existence of an agreement Jim did 
or did not send them would change this.  It's more the four or five people 
who actually ARE working who might care, but I'll bet they're already 
members (maybe they ARE the premium members).

Anyone have an actual preference one way or the other on which membership 
to honor?

  - Erik

--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc