[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] Foreign vs US Memberships -- 2nd Draft
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Foreign vs US Memberships -- 2nd Draft
- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 11:56:20 -0700 (PDT)
Note the I haven't forgotten to take allocated revenues into consideration,
it's just that the amount for TAG is inconsequential.
----- Original Message ----
From: S. Hieber <shieber@yahoo.com>
To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 2:50:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Foreign vs US Memberships -- 2nd Draft
Now that I had a chance to look up in my archive of money files at home, I've
determined that my original off-the-cuff estimate of the overheads was very
low. The actual overheads for the last full year, on an allocated basis, are
much higher, over $3 per one year TAG membership, or about $0.80 per issue
based on 2005.
So I revised the spreadsheet, cleaned up a few things, and added a couple
columns to show the impact of the allcoated overheads and the 1-year pricing,
actual and recommended.
So, I'd recomend dropping about $5 per year off of the Foreign membership and
adding $3 to the local. That doesn't quite balance things but it's much closer.
sh
S. Hieber wrote:
> Try the attached done in Excel version 5
>
>
> I don't have a special problem with th$800 number. I think its a soft number
> and I don't have any means tofirm it up so I addressed it only to say I
> wasn't addressing it. How that for Friday morning tap dance ? ;-)
>
>
> My feeling is that an item should pay its way, especially if it is the
> mainstay heart and core product of the business. I'd rather we could just
> lower prices all around. But I think the same fairness that says, lower the
> foreign prices, says to raise the locals up to carrying their own weight.
> We'v e been living high off the foreign members and the locals have been
> sucking up some of that largesse. Time to button up the blouse, so to speak.
>
> I share your reluctance but I must follow where my propeller takes me, it
> being atached an all.
>
> sh
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>
> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 12:33:00 PM
> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Foreign vs US Memberships
>
>
> S. Hieber wrote:
>> This is only a 1st draft and maybe I flubbed a cell reference
>
> I have an ancient version of Excel. Can you e-mail me one saved as an
> older version or as a csv or something?
>
>> I'm not sure how the $800 per year number was derived
>
> Ummmm... guessing. Assumming that all the foreigners were on one-year
> memberships and calculating the difference and rounding up.
>
>> It's been a few years since we increased, hasn't it?
>>
>
> Since I started as membership chair in, say, January of 2003.
>
> I really *don't want* to increase the US membership prices. I'm not
> adamantly against it, just reluctant.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc