Re: [AGA-sc] Foreign vs US Memberships -- 2nd Draft

[Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>]

waitaminutewaitaminutewaitaminute. The reason we started accepting 
advertising was so that we could produce TAG in color without raising 
membership dues. Now we have discovered that the membership dues 
*almost* covers TAG production, without considering the advertising?

I think TAG should be paying its own way, but that includes revenues 
from advertising also.

Cheryl



S. Hieber wrote:
> Note the I haven't forgotten to take allocated revenues into consideration, 
> it's just that the amount for TAG is inconsequential.
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: S. Hieber <shieber@yahoo.com>
> To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
> Sent: Sunday, May 28, 2006 2:50:38 PM
> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Foreign vs US Memberships -- 2nd Draft
> 
> 
> Now that I had a chance to look up in my archive of money files at home, I've 
> determined that my original off-the-cuff estimate of the overheads was very 
> low. The actual overheads for the last full year, on an allocated basis, are 
> much higher, over $3 per one year TAG membership, or about $0.80 per issue 
> based on 2005.
> 
> So I revised the spreadsheet, cleaned up a few things, and added a couple 
> columns to show the impact of the allcoated overheads and the 1-year pricing, 
> actual and recommended.
> 
> So, I'd recomend dropping about $5 per year off of the Foreign membership and 
> adding $3 to the local. That doesn't quite balance things but it's much 
> closer.
> 
> sh
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc