I don't understand why you don't understand. Ricky wants Luis to go to AGA. He offers to let Luis have his comps. To make us and Luis feel better about it, he will share his presentation with Luis. They will come up with something in Iwagumi together. The question was never to give another set of speaker comps. That's the whole point. Ricky will pay so that AGA doesn't have to comp another speaker, but Luis will feel good about going as a contributor instead of a free-loader. S. Hieber wrote: > Well, that's the part I wasn't clear about. Why was Ricky paying for himself > if what he meant to do was pay for Luis? Anyway, if the question is merely, > can there be a second speaker without free reg, banq or roomnights, that's a > no brainer. This is what I am talking about. Does it really matter to you or GA whether Ricky pays for himself or for Luis? > If the question is add another speaker to a short peresentation and give > another set of speaker comps, then that's not two for for one , , , That was never the question. As I said before, "We're not talking about another set of comps." > > Well, I'm not clear which it is you're asking about I'm not sure I can be any more clear. Cheryl _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc