Re: [AGA-sc] Luis

["Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>]

Oops.  Another I-guess-I-should-have-read-all-the-messages-first.<g>

Karen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cheryl Rogers" <cheryl@wilstream.com>
To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 2:46 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] Luis


>I don't understand why you don't understand.
>
> Ricky wants Luis to go to AGA. He offers to let Luis have his comps. To
> make us and Luis feel better about it, he will share his presentation
> with Luis. They will come up with something in Iwagumi together.
>
> The question was never to give another set of speaker comps.
>
> That's the whole point. Ricky will pay so that AGA doesn't have to comp
> another speaker, but Luis will feel good about going as a contributor
> instead of a free-loader.
>
> S. Hieber wrote:
>> Well, that's the part I wasn't clear about. Why was Ricky paying for 
>> himself if what he meant to do was pay for Luis? Anyway, if the question 
>> is merely, can there be a second speaker without free reg, banq or 
>> roomnights, that's a no brainer.
>
> This is what I am talking about. Does it really matter to you or GA
> whether Ricky pays for himself or for Luis?
>
>
>> If the question is add another speaker to a short peresentation and give 
>> another set of speaker comps, then that's not two for for one , , ,
>
> That was never the question. As I said before, "We're not talking about
> another set of comps."
>
>>
>> Well, I'm not clear which it is you're asking about
>
>
> I'm not sure I can be any more clear.
>
> Cheryl
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> 


_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc