That's great, Erik. And you're right, every year we end up with some different "annoyance factor", whether it's with the contest, the convention or both!<g> I'm looking forward to getting the judging under way. Do we have all the judges yet? Karen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik Olson" <erik@thekrib.com> To: <aga-contest@thekrib.com> Cc: <aga-sc@thekrib.com> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 3:36 AM Subject: [AGA-sc] [121] contest entry autopsy 2006 > So it's after midnight here, and it's 121 entries possible. > The final number will probably go down as there are 2-3 questionable > entries, but not too shabby considering the total lack of PR. I guess > cash IS a major motivator. :( > > Almost nobody using postal mail this year. Two personal checks, one bank > draft, and $20 in cash. I think I scanned in only one entry, and one > other person sent a CD-ROM. So that's great. I prefer not having the > giant stack of papers of previous contests. > > Several entries still without photo releases. One thing I did different > this year is I sent no reminders until after the contest closed, i.e., > just now. I had no time to track this stuff. So it will be interesting > to see how well the stragglers are motivated by the spectre of humiliation > by the "censor judge" picture [or more appropriately, her 2006 > equivalent]. It worked pretty nicely last year on a few guys who ignored > the e-mails; about half signed the release once the site went live. I am > wondering if it will help reduce the problem to begin with now. > > Likewise, there still continue to be folks who don't follow the directions > on the photo release, sending a Word document with everything printed > (complete with the original instructions "Do not send a WORD Document" > included in the document!), or just a signature, or even just the photos > themselves. Still others are completionists and send a separate release > for each photo. And there's some folks that sent e-mails AND faxes. I've > gotten used to sending quick firm replies to the ones lacking, and > eventually everyone's getting it. I think NEXT year (if I continue to do > the technical work on this contest; or if not, for whoever takes this job > on) it might make sense to modify the program to let them upload the photo > release directly to the entry as another picture that doesn't show up in > the contest. Maybe. It's working about as well as to be expected. > > There are the usual one-off oddities in the entries themselves. Most > interesting is that someone has done a topiary swan with bogwood and moss, > and in one of their photos has actually photoshopped in a real swan to > show you what they're thinking, just in case you don't get it. Another > entry has a picture of the aquarist's wife/daughter/sister changing the > tank (I removed the name). A couple of folks have their name burned in & > we'll have to get them to remove them or photoshop them out. One person > didn't upload their photos to the site, but instead to a free > "photobucket-type" site, and inlined the images in the comments... No big > deal. A challenge to the tech geek. As I say, just one-offs. > > But every year there seems to be a recurring "grr" that seems to happen > systematically across many entries. Last year it was all these folks > mailing 10 photos, or a photo collage of 25 tiny images posing as one. > This year it definitely is UNNECESSARY FRAMES! I can understand the raw > photos from the camera being uploaded uncropped, but lots of people are > uploading photos with large black bars around the photos, or a large black > bar and a small white bar. I will be hand-cropping each of these, as they > just make the final image harder to see. > > > -- > Erik Olson > erik at thekrib dot com > _______________________________________________ > AGA-sc mailing list > AGA-sc@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc > _______________________________________________ AGA-sc mailing list AGA-sc@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc