[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-sc] [121] contest entry autopsy 2006
- To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] [121] contest entry autopsy 2006
- From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 18:31:37 -0500
- Organization: Aquatic Gardeners Association
- User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
annoyance factor = learning opportunity.
Jeez, that sounds snotty. :-)
Cheryl
Karen Randall wrote:
> That's great, Erik. And you're right, every year we end up with some
> different "annoyance factor", whether it's with the contest, the convention
> or both!<g>
>
> I'm looking forward to getting the judging under way. Do we have all the
> judges yet?
>
> Karen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Erik Olson" <erik@thekrib.com>
> To: <aga-contest@thekrib.com>
> Cc: <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
> Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 3:36 AM
> Subject: [AGA-sc] [121] contest entry autopsy 2006
>
>
>> So it's after midnight here, and it's 121 entries possible.
>> The final number will probably go down as there are 2-3 questionable
>> entries, but not too shabby considering the total lack of PR. I guess
>> cash IS a major motivator. :(
>>
>> Almost nobody using postal mail this year. Two personal checks, one bank
>> draft, and $20 in cash. I think I scanned in only one entry, and one
>> other person sent a CD-ROM. So that's great. I prefer not having the
>> giant stack of papers of previous contests.
>>
>> Several entries still without photo releases. One thing I did different
>> this year is I sent no reminders until after the contest closed, i.e.,
>> just now. I had no time to track this stuff. So it will be interesting
>> to see how well the stragglers are motivated by the spectre of humiliation
>> by the "censor judge" picture [or more appropriately, her 2006
>> equivalent]. It worked pretty nicely last year on a few guys who ignored
>> the e-mails; about half signed the release once the site went live. I am
>> wondering if it will help reduce the problem to begin with now.
>>
>> Likewise, there still continue to be folks who don't follow the directions
>> on the photo release, sending a Word document with everything printed
>> (complete with the original instructions "Do not send a WORD Document"
>> included in the document!), or just a signature, or even just the photos
>> themselves. Still others are completionists and send a separate release
>> for each photo. And there's some folks that sent e-mails AND faxes. I've
>> gotten used to sending quick firm replies to the ones lacking, and
>> eventually everyone's getting it. I think NEXT year (if I continue to do
>> the technical work on this contest; or if not, for whoever takes this job
>> on) it might make sense to modify the program to let them upload the photo
>> release directly to the entry as another picture that doesn't show up in
>> the contest. Maybe. It's working about as well as to be expected.
>>
>> There are the usual one-off oddities in the entries themselves. Most
>> interesting is that someone has done a topiary swan with bogwood and moss,
>> and in one of their photos has actually photoshopped in a real swan to
>> show you what they're thinking, just in case you don't get it. Another
>> entry has a picture of the aquarist's wife/daughter/sister changing the
>> tank (I removed the name). A couple of folks have their name burned in &
>> we'll have to get them to remove them or photoshop them out. One person
>> didn't upload their photos to the site, but instead to a free
>> "photobucket-type" site, and inlined the images in the comments... No big
>> deal. A challenge to the tech geek. As I say, just one-offs.
>>
>> But every year there seems to be a recurring "grr" that seems to happen
>> systematically across many entries. Last year it was all these folks
>> mailing 10 photos, or a photo collage of 25 tiny images posing as one.
>> This year it definitely is UNNECESSARY FRAMES! I can understand the raw
>> photos from the camera being uploaded uncropped, but lots of people are
>> uploading photos with large black bars around the photos, or a large black
>> bar and a small white bar. I will be hand-cropping each of these, as they
>> just make the final image harder to see.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Erik Olson
>> erik at thekrib dot com
>> _______________________________________________
>> AGA-sc mailing list
>> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
>> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc