Re: [AGA-sc] proposal for walk-in rate

[Larry Lampert <l_lampert@yahoo.com>]

Simply for the sake of consistency, I would prefer to
do it this way since this is what we have done in the
past. We are only talking about just a few people and
a few dollars so I am not to concerned either way.

--- Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> wrote:

> This is fine too.  I don't have a strong feeling
> about it one way or the 
> other.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
> To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board"
> <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2006 6:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] proposal for walk-in rate
> 
> 
> > In the past, we have had a cutoof date, after
> which the reg fee was $10 
> > higher and one still had to be an AGA member. I'd
> suggest a cutoof date of 
> > either Oct 12, the last day to get the Hotel room
> rate and about 1 month 
> > before the convention or, if that seems too soon,
> then Oct 20 which is 3 
> > week before.
> >
> > If any of teh SF folks don't like paying the tax, 
> phllllllllbbtttt.
> > sh
> >
> > * * * * * * * * *
> > The deadline is Oct 12 for getting the special
> Convention room rate!
> >
> > Read about the Aquatic Gardeners Association
> Convention at
> > http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org/convention.html
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----
> > From: Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>
> > To: aga-sc@thekrib.com
> > Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2006 6:06:24 PM
> > Subject: [AGA-sc] proposal for walk-in rate
> >
> >
> > Apparently (according to my virtual mole) there
> was some kind of question
> > about people joining SFBAAPS since May having to
> pay the AGA membership
> > "tax" for convention reg, and Jim's response was
> since the convention
> > didn't seem to be breaking even, we should
> consider changing that rule.
> >
> > Got me thinking that we should really have our
> walk-in rate worked out
> > before the convention.  I know I haven't put
> anything on the site about
> > it, but that's because I didn't really know what
> it was.
> >
> > I was thinking we should have something that
> doesn't penalize anyone
> > who signed up earlier, especially those who bought
> AGA memberships.  But
> > at the same time, I want it to pre-deflect the
> litany of complaints from
> > locals who didn't know anything about joining AGA
> when they show up.
> >
> > I figure it would be a reasonable expectation that
> walk-ins pay a bit more
> > than pre-reg, even if we didn't advertise it thus
> far.
> >
> > So what if we advertise "$69 Walk-in registration"
> but if they're a
> > paid-up AGA member, discount it to $59?
> >
> >   - Erik
> >
> > -- 
> > Erik Olson
> > erik at thekrib dot com
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-sc mailing list
> > AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > AGA-sc mailing list
> > AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
> 

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc