[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question



Well, it gets the value into the hands of the earaching. It makes more work for Cheryl on the memberlist.

----- Original Message ----
From: Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>
To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 5:19:53 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question

RE distribution of the liquidated damages. we could do that in any of a number of ways -- for example, we could grant an extra 6 or 9 months of TAG to convention registrants -- in effect, forcing the number of foks that take advantage of the arrangement *and* fixing the value. That would be rather definitive and no cost to AGA since it would be covered by some or all of the liquidated damages from the hotel.  For example, if 9-moht extensions were used, you'd have 103registrants*$18foregone revenues*.75year = $1390, with a remainder of $409 in liquidated damages remaining with AGA2K6.
 
Ooh, I like that idea a LOT better than sending out checks!
 
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc