[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]

Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question



Financially, it's a windfall for AGA and SFBAAPS and therefore accruing to all the membership of each organization rather than to the convention folks. I'm still in favor of the membership deal if Cheryl doesn't mind the work for her that it involves. My concern about discounts is that they are vague in dollar amount and who actually ends up obtaining the benefits.
 
sh

----- Original Message ----
From: Kathy Olson <kathy@thekrib.com>
To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 11:35:59 PM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question

Hi all,
We WORK too damn hard, and worry too much to have to send this money back
to everyone.
>From what I know there weren't any serious huffs from participants about
the noise.  FOr those that did complain, maybe we send them a DVD and
leave it at that.

I like the idea of offering them at a 20-25% discount to convention goes
as a special because of the noise or if you wanted do a 50%, but really I
don't think it needs to be sent back.  People just rolled with it, and it
was Friday's talks, there were ony two it impacted, really not like it
ruined the whole convention.

Kathy


On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, S. Hieber wrote:

>> From a financial and accounting standpoint, the one doesn't follow from the other.

The discount isn't a cost of the DVD; if the discount was offered, as I'm now guessing, as a convention benefit, then it's a cost of the convention. But this doesn't have to get complicated. Any reasonable estimate is worthy, approximate value times estimated number of persons that will acutally use the discount.

I missunderstood that the discount was a noise compensation. I understand now that it is not.

RE distribution of the liquidated damages. we could do that in any of a number of ways -- for example, we could grant an extra 6 or 9 months of TAG to convention registrants -- in effect, forcing the number of foks that take advantage of the arrangement *and* fixing the value. That would be rather definitive and no cost to AGA since it would be covered by some or all of the liquidated damages from the hotel.  For example, if 9-moht extensions were used, you'd have 103registrants*$18foregone revenues*.75year = $1390, with a remainder of $409 in liquidated damages remaining with AGA2K6.

Have we offered the convention discount in prior years. I don't remember.

sh


----- Original Message ----
From: Cheryl Rogers <cheryl@wilstream.com>
To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Monday, November 20, 2006 10:12:27 AM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question


> CR said we gave folks a discount. We should have made that a fixed
> amount and accrued the liability as a charge to AGA2K6. What discount
> did we offer? I need to estimate the amount to charge against AGA2K6.

We offered 10% off the 2006 convention DVD via special web site link
when it becomes available, hopefully in time for Christmas gift-giving.
We don't know the final price of this DVD, because we don't know how
many disks it will be. This offer was in the program.

I don't think this should be an AGA2K6 expense. I think this should be a
perk for registration and an AGA thing, unless we also plan to give DVD
*profits* to AGA2K6, and therefore SFBAAPS a cut in DVD profits. And if
we do that, do we retroactively give GWAPA a royalty on 2004 sales?
DFWAPC a royalty on 2003 DVD sales?

Cheryl
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc

_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc