Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question

[Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com>]

I am cool with that.  Earmarked for extra speaker budget.  And credited to 
Larry's hard work.  Left out of AGA2k6 entirely.

I can see the point of view: By splitting it up amongst all the 
individuals, it's like a class-action lawsuit.  Nobody gets very much 
individually.  But if kept as a single fund, it brings in something 
significant that everyone at the next convention can enjoy.   Yeah, I do 
like that.

(Add to that, I am still a little disappointed that we didn't bring in Dr. 
Tan the moss guy -- it was one of only around two areas I disagreed with 
the rest of you guys and actually fought for the SFBAAPS proposal.  I 
don't think even Jim knows this.  When we announce the official numbers to 
Jim and SFBAAPS, I will include a note saying I hope they use their share 
of the income to bring Dr. Tan over, and please let me know so I can 
decide whether I want to come down and see the talk!)

   - Erik

PS: Ricky and Dr. George now done with editing.  Just Ole and IA to do. 
IA may end up being a pain, but results may be quite fun.  I'm looking at 
purchasing some royalty-free music to include during the 5-minute 
"scaping" scene, so it ends up looking like a music video. :)

On Thu, 23 Nov 2006, S. Hieber wrote:

> Okay with me. We credit the money to AGA and not to AGA2K6 and use it for the 
> next convention.

Gong once, going twice....


---- Original Message ----
From: Karen Randall <krandall@rdrcpa.biz>
To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 8:05:33 AM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question


I think that was about te cost of bring Professor Moss over, wasn't it?

Karen

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kathy Olson" <kathy@thekrib.com>
To: "Aquatic Gardeners Association Board" <aga-sc@thekrib.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question


>I think this is the BEST idea yet!  Bring in a REALLY COOL speaker we
> otherwise wouldn't.  It would benefit all the AGA memebers and the AGA.  I
> like this even better than any other idea!
>
> K
>
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Karen Randall wrote:
>
>> I think one could reasonably say that anything we did for AGA as a whole 
>> should essentially be a benefit to the members.  We could even hold the 
>> whole $1,800 toward bring in an extra, spiffy speaker for the next 
>> convention.  I don't really care that much, so I'll let those who do 
>> decide.<g>
>>
>> Karen
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>>  From: S. Hieber
>>  To: Aquatic Gardeners Association Board
>>  Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 11:51 AM
>>  Subject: Re: [AGA-sc] noise pain n suffering reim question
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  Here we have a very distinct amount, a precise value because Larry 
>> negotiated with the hotel to arrive at a distinct figure -- that's the 
>> essence liquidated damages, a specific amount of money (the liquidity) 
>> agreed to as full rememdy for damage that cannot be easily valuated or 
>> remedied by specific performance.
>>
>>  It's reasonably clear who was harmed. So, it's a matter of moving the 
>> value of the remedy to those harmed, which I guess is where we're at.
>>
>>
>>  sh
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  AGA-sc mailing list
>>  AGA-sc@thekrib.com
>>  http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>>
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-sc mailing list
> AGA-sc@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc
>


_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc

-- 
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
AGA-sc mailing list
AGA-sc@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-sc