If (stress if, I know of no proof either) both wild and comm. raised fish (rams, kribs, what-have-you) exhibit this behaviour exclusively in aquaria. There are a couple things that could be at play. Fish which generally lay 200-300 eggs has no choice but to lay eggs when given the proper conditions (water quality, suitable mate, etc.). Now given that fish finds itself in a small glass cage (compared to the freedom of a boundless river or lake), could we not hypothesize that the fish has assessed its surroundings and deemed the physical area not suitable for the survival of itself, its mate and 200-300 young. I'm taking a bit of a liberty here assuming the fish has that capacity but there are many other instances in nature which make concessions for this type of behaviour. Take for example the Loon which will sit by and watch its dominant young kill other fledgelings when there is not enough food for both to survive (and that is in the wild). I am certain that a baby loon can't make any type of intelligent assessment as to whether or not the parents are competing with others in the area for food, it just knows that its hungry and sister/brother is also eating, why not kill it and get all the food. Could fish instinctually know what size of physical territory they require to successfully raise whatever size of brood they generally produce. Is it so far fetched to theorize that once they know their surroundings won't be sufficient to sustain their reproduction they decide that the clutch of eggs has to go before it hatches and they have to compete with their own progeny? Especially when they parents are healthy and strong... "as long as I survive, I won't be extinct". I have no research to back up my ponderings, I am by no means an expert on any type of fish and make no claim of the sort. I am simply serving up some food for thought on a subject which intrigues me. Maybe this could spawn some more discussion/research into the subject. After all, does ASG not stand for Apistogramma STUDY Group. Maybe we could lobby for some research grant money and start a research project into this. The Canadian Government, last year, gave a $2500.00 grant for research into a device which can communicate with grapefruit (no BS). Thoughts? Kyle > -----Original Message----- > From: Frauley/Elson [SMTP:fraulels@minet.ca] > Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 5:51 PM > To: apisto@majordomo.pobox.com > Subject: egg eating wasRe: GSAS Re: Tampa Bay > > I have questions about a couple of the assumptions here. > First, do we know egg eating is a problem in the wild? If not (and I've > not read of it) then it is likely aquarium behavior, and can be blamed > on aquarium conditions ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!