Ken, Patricia is correct. "A. viejita Color Form II" does not conform exactly to the type material of A. viejita. It appears to be a species closely related to A. viejita and has been called the Rotflecken/Red-flecked Apisto. It probably is a more colorful form of the Schwarzkehl/Black-throat Apisto (a.k.a. A. viejita Color Form III). A. viejita Color Form I matches A. viejita and comes from the type locality, so it should be the "real" A. viejita. Now that I've written this, I will add a caveat. I agree with Koslowski, who believes that it is better to finely divide the different forms of apistos and list them as species for now. It is possible many species of apistos will be combined by some taxonomist in the future. If this occurs, all of the above species will be considered one species - A. macmasteri! Mike Wise Ken Laidlaw wrote: > I believe viejita II are just that and do not go by any other name. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. > > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, > > email apisto-request@listbox.com. > > Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing > > List Archives"! > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, > email apisto-request@listbox.com. > Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!