"but don't put this fight off on me this time Mr. Sanchez...I'm clean in this one....you are on your own here!" Jacobs your like a weasel. You are so tring to look good to the people here on the list. See David Picks on me, see David is the trouble maker etc etc.. Jacobs be a MAN for heavens sake get some balls man. Everyone on this list that has been here for a few years knows that you have and me have had our diffrences. The fish world is a small world and I often hear of you bad mouthing me Jacobs. If you really want to be "innocent" you should have not gotten involved in the discussion. Given our history that would have been prudent. I would ask anyone to simply search the Apisto archives for proof of your countless harsh words and attacks on me. Not to mention the crap I still hear from you from other hobbyist today. So jacobs if you really wan't to be innocent keep your trap shut. I wil be honest, tell you to your face I don't like you. I think your a hot headed, pig headed, boastfull weasel. There it's in the open. I think it best if we simply ignore each others post if we want to coexist on the list and for the betterment of this group. A long time ago I wrote you an e-mail asking you to let bygones be by gones. you refused and have been a pain in my arse ever since. I am a nice guy but get on my bad side and watch out. So quit your whining. Be a man. You reap what you sow. Dave Sanchez --- mjacobs2@tampabay.rr.com wrote: > David Sanchez......I would have accepted your humor > had you not put at the > end... > > "I know your true colors. > Good night Meat Tits" > > ...if you would wish to explain to the list the > humor in those words then I'll > accept it as humor oherwise just drop it ... but > don't put this fight off on me > this time Mr. Sanchez...I'm clean in this one....you > are on your own here! > > Mike Jacobs > > > > > Relax Jacobs. I said that in jest note the smile > :). > > Your counting. Please. If I was to go through the > > Apisto archives and count all the times you have > > attacked me. Would you like some cheese with your > > wine. > > > > THE DAVE > > > > > > > > --- mjacobs2@tampabay.rr.com wrote: > > > ......OK list, I'll ignor this......but I am > > > counting........sorry! > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > "I'm > > > > not > > > > picking sides to cause > trouble..............really > > > I'm > > > > > > > > not.............!!!!!" > > > > > > > > If I had a nickel for all the times you said > that > > > on > > > > the Apisto list I'd be a rich man Jacobs. But > it's > > > ok > > > > I know your true colors. > > > > > > > > Good night Meat Tits > > > > > > > > Dave :) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Mike Jacobs <mjacobs2@tampabay.rr.com> > wrote: > > > > > .......................Youngker's in my > > > > > canoe.................that was the > > > > > damnest explanation I've ever seen. I've > read > > > it 4 > > > > > times and will have to > > > > > do it 2-3 more times and talk to our > chemistry > > > > > teacher at school. I'm not > > > > > picking sides to cause > > > trouble..............really > > > > > I'm not.............!!!!! > > > > > And all I wanted to do was grow some > > > > > foxtail.............just add another > > > > > fluorescent tube Mike..........heh, heh, > > > > > heh.........wow! Somewhere in > > > > > there I should be able to use > differentiation or > > > > > integration to grow that > > > > > foxtail.................remember in there > about > > > > > trying to divide by > > > > > zero...................I followed > that.....;-) > > > ;-) > > > > > ;-).....you know the > > > > > definition of a "black > > > > > > > > > hole"??????..................................it's > > > > > where God tried to divide by > > > > > zero...................... > > > > > > > > > > ...............I think we all ought to go to > > > Java > > > > > moss................;-) > > > > > ;-) ;-) > > > > > > > > > > ....hey Big John........I didn't see > anything > > > about > > > > > "blue goop" in there. > > > > > did you!! > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > Mike Jacobs > > > > > Center for Advanced Technologies > > > > > High School Math Instructor > > > > > St. Pete, Fl. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "David A. Youngker" > > > <nestor10@mindspring.com> > > > > > To: "Apistogramma Mailing List" > > > <apisto@listbox.com> > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 6:42 PM > > > > > Subject: Determining CO2 Concentrations in > > > Natural > > > > > Waters > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: David Sanchez > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:56 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think you just don!'t understand the > > > > > relationship > > > > > > > between pH and carbonic acid... > > > > > > > > > > > > David - > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm afraid that it is you that has > confused a > > > few > > > > > issues. Let's see if we > > > > > > can walk through this in an academic > manner > > > and > > > > > arrive at some sort of > > > > > > "consensus", shall we? > > > > > > > > > > > > > KH and pH both determine the level of > CO2 in > > > a > > > > > > > body of water. This comes from a basic > > > > > > > understanding of the pH equation. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is no "pH equation", per se - only > the > > > > > _definition_ of pH, which is > > > > > an > > > > > > inverse log of the actual *count* of > hydrogen > > > ions > > > > > in a solution. It's a > > > > > log > > > > > > scale because we're dealing with _huge_ > > > numbers > > > > > here, and the numbers we > > > > > > _do_ use are in effect the *exponent* of > the > > > > > value. > > > > > > > > > > > > The level of free hydrogen in the solution > is > > > > > totally dependent upon what > > > > > > the various solutes _release_ into the > > > solvent. > > > > > Since the most commonly > > > > > > found buffer in natural systems, from > stream > > > beds > > > > > to bloodstreams, is the > > > > > > bicarbonate ion, we usually have to look > no > > > > > further than the dissociation > > > > > > constant of that ion to see how many > hydrogen > > > ions > > > > > it will provide. > > > > > > > > > > > > The formula you're probably thinking of is > the > > > > > bicarbonate equilibrium > > > > > > described by the commonly-referenced > > > > > > > > > > > > H2CO3 <=> H+ + HCO3- > > > > > > > > > > > > which shows the products and reactants in > > > relation > > > > > to the equilibrium > > > > > point. > > > > > > The actual point itself, determined > through > > > about > > > > > 150 years' of empirical > > > > > > data collected by analytical chemists, is > > > > > described as a ratio of products > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! http://auctions.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com.