>I remember from my killie days that there are several species of Aphyosemion >whose various populations and subspecies were occasionally incompatible as >far as fertility, while other species in the genus were crossable with >similar species. Go figure. Over time, isolated populations can develop >differences in chromosome count, or differences in gene arrangement on the >chromosomes. How this happens, I don''t have a clue. Maybe Dr. Uwe can >handle the technical part of this answer. > It does seem reasonable therefore that between different populations of A. >aggasizii, especially different color morphs from different major areas, >there can be some lack of fertililty in cross-spawning. I guess the best way >to answer the question is to try it. Please, though, if you do it, remember >that purity of strains is significantly important to the majority of us. >Bob Dixon > Some one on an earlier post mentioned that this is where the definition of "species" comes into play. The definition of species has appeared to be a lot less clear-cut than my days in high school biology (long ago) when it was than members of the same species can produce fertile off-spring. In recent years, I have heard that members of different species can conceivable produce fertile offspring but maybe not carry the fertility to the 2nd or 3rd generation (don't remember where I heard this). Anyway--does anybody know what is the currently accepted definition of species? We have been warned of cross-breeding Apistogramma species, yet I have never seen one. When Dr. Uwe Romer spoke in San Francisco, I asked him why the various books on apistos did not list fin-ray counts, scale counts, gill-raker counts, and intestinal lengths as Pierre Brichard did on his first book on Lake Tanganyikan cichlids. Dr. Romer thought that there was too much overlap of those physical descriptions to provide very much value in identifying apistos. I think the answer to some of these questions may be cleared up by DNA studies of the various apistos. There are many cases of parallel evolution where fish that were not closely related appeared that they were close related--i.e. Paracyphrochromis and Cyphrochromis (spelling?) genus of Lake Tanganyika. So if you see two fish that look like Aggies, are they both aggies? ______________________________________________________