In a message dated 97-10-28 08:06:20 EST, Robert Marshall says: << Should I install an under ground filter. Lots of opinions about no but > no reasons why. Leaning towards get one so tell me your experiences. > yes or no. If no what filters should I use in addition to my Fluval 4 - > tank is a 50 gal. Sand, which I like, or gravel. If I don't use a UGF > I am going to insert a layer of peat moss. >> >> I use undergravel filters regularly. The only problems I have seen is that the fish-pooh tends to build up in the gravel. This is good for plants, as it provides an excellent substrate after enough of the detritius collects. I recently solved this problem in a 30 gallon I was redoing. I built a reverse-flow, air-powered UGF from scratch materials. The gravel stays clean, there is enough media for an adequate nitrogen cycle, and the current is very minimal, even though it skims the surface AND is moving water at a pace of 70 gallons per hour. Years ago I had a 55 with a peat moss pad between the filter and the gravel. IT worked well, but I ended up putting a box filter full of charcoal in one corner to keep the discoloration down. In the early eighties, an undergravel filter with a very slow flow rate was the filter of choice for most members of the Apistogramma Study Group. Lots of people who are into aquatic plants don't like the UGF, but they use a number of thick soil-like substrates, which keep the filter from getting an adequate flow. The only down side I see to UGF's is that you don't get to spend time and money on replacing filter media and futzing with getting it to work just the way you want( for those who love excuses to spend money and unneeded time on their tanks- that's not me). And once in a while, like every three ore four years, you need to take the tank down and clean the gravel, or simply get one of those siphon-vacuum cleaner things that lets you suck the dirt out while you're doing your water changes. Good luck, Bob