RE: A. panduro

[Bill MacIndewar <wmac@reading.mec.edu>]

- ------ =_NextPart_000_01BD00BF.D213ABE0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mike,

	Just tried to send a message back to you off the mailing list,
but it came back as undeliverable.  Not sure why...here's another attempt.
	I apologize if I gave you the wrong idea, but the message I sent
this morning was certainly not intended to be argumentative.  I was 
honestly confused as to whether A.panduro and A sp. "pandurini" were
the same species.  I thank you for helping to clear it up for me.  I am a
relative newcomer to Apisto's, and really just want to learn and benefit
from the expertise of others on the mailing list.
	Perhaps we are referring to a different article.  The article I read
was printed in the November issue of the ACA's Buntbarsche Bulletin,
and was authored by Uwe Romer.  Is this the same article you are 
speaking of?  I look forward to your report.

				Bill

(P.S.   I have never kept killies!!! )


- ----------
From: 	Mike Jacobs[SMTP:mfjacobs@geocities.com]
Sent: 	Wednesday, December 03, 1997 7:53 PM
To: 	apisto@majordomo.pobox.com
Subject: 	Re: A. panduro

Bill........Let's don't be like the "old Killie" list and argue.....I
said you said we said.......but I will go back and find the articla.  a
friend of mine knew I knew of Uwe Romer and gave me the B.B.
magazine....the most recent one.....and I read the article that A."pand"
was A. panduro etc, etc.       I'll find the article and report....!

Have a good day

Mike