Bob wrote: > >If we could solve that, it would be great. If those fortunate few of us who >do collect were to establish a system, perhaps starting with the already >common use of terms like "Rio Mamore", and "Rio Tefe", and building on that, >It would be great, even if it only was maintained among the growing network ok >Apistophiles who are online and in groups like the ACA and ASG. Today I >learned that there are color morphs of brichardi. It would be useful to know >the locations of the various populations, just as it would the multitudinous >aggies, borelliis, and others. > >Perhaps we could establish a map of the Apisto range, and post the identified >known locations of the various species and sub-strains on it? This would be >cool, eh? > >Bob > Bob--You're right. My point about trying to get groups at one time can be somewhat justified by what you mentioned about learning about different color morphs of Brichardi. There's at least a half dozen different species of Lake Tanganyikan fish which look very much like Brichardi. Many of them were probably imported as Brichardi at one time. This knowledge is fairly recent. We will undoubtedly learn to make these distinctions with apistos as in the Trifasciata types and the different MacMasteri types. ______________________________________________________