>Thanks again for the comments. Pulcher it probably is, but check out the >taeniatus pictures in Richter's book for a comparison. > Doug, I don't own Richter's book, but if it is a tfh publication you're using for identification...I'd recommend you get a second opinion. TFH is known for sloppy photo captioning/editing. Linke and Staeck have an excellent photo of your pulcher on pg. 135. Compare with green taeniatus on pg. 160. Should eliminate any confusion. Take it easy - - Steve