Vinod Kutty wrote: > Mike Wise wrote: > Having read Römer's complete manuscript, I see that much ancillary data was > deleted from the A. C. A.'s published version. This, along with mislabeled > photos and typographical errors has ruffled many feathers in the scientific > community. > > _______ > > I've heard from reliable sources that Buntbarsche Bulletin's chronic > editorial boo-boo problems are being addressed. The seriousness of the > problem was drive home when the BOT saw membership drop by 700. In theory, BB > is not an inappropriate place to publish Apisto descriptions. I agree. I, too, hope that the BB gets back to the Randy Crout & Wayne Leibel days. This depends not just on improving the proof reading, but on the ACA members supplying quality articles for the journal. Sadly, materialism has set in to the extent that publications like the BB are losing quality authors the "slicks" that pay for articles. I'm not totally against this, but feel we lose a lot of diversity in articles when an editor decides which articles are published based solely on what will attract the most readers (and advertisers). > Hope Romer will continue to describe Apistos. Here! Here! No one else is scientifically describing apistos. Past authors have moved on the grander enterprises. Mike Wise p.s. Expect to see an Apisto article in the BB by Marco Lacerda & myself soon. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@majordomo.pobox.com. > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, > email apisto-request@majordomo.pobox.com. > Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@majordomo.pobox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@majordomo.pobox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!