I may regret this in the near future due to the tone of the debate that is ongoing, but I would like to point out that the issue of selecting individuals with egg-eating behavior by rearing eggs artificially is further complicated by the fact that, if a selection indeed occurs (I have no competence in this, and personally I just don't know), it might refer to the lack of ability to raise eggs in a non-natural environment. In other words, I am wondering if the strains that eat eggs might have a behavior more "natural" than those who don't, given the obvious advantage of re-cycling energy resources when the ideal spawning conditions (physical and environmental, such as pH, conductivity, lack of adequate territory size, etc.) are not present. So, I am not even sure if egg-eating is a negative or positive trait: probably it depends on what the acquarist wants to accomplish, and both views are acceptable. Take this as an hypothesis from somebody who knows nothing about ethology. Dionigi Maladorno dionigi.maladorno@roche.com This message presents personal opinions which are not necessarily those of my employer. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@majordomo.pobox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@majordomo.pobox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!