The only simple way (without laboratory analyses) that I know of is to put a specific amount of dye (food coloring) into a tank and determine the time it take the carbon to strip it out. Time fresh carbon first as a reference standard. Once it takes the carbon 3 or 4 X the length of time of your reference it's time to change it. Carbon is fairly inexpensive. Why not just change it on a weekly or biweekly schedule? Mike Wise IDMiamiBob@aol.com wrote: > The recent thread got me to thinking- If DOcs are indeed a factor in growth > rates, then carbon filtering should make a difference. Has anyone on the > list actually run a control-group comparison of growth rates with and without > carbon filtering (in addition to regular water changes of course)? Does > anyone know of a way to monitor carbon to know when it is nearing the end of > its useful life and is ready for replacement? > > Bob Dixon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@majordomo.pobox.com. > For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, > email apisto-request@majordomo.pobox.com. > Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@majordomo.pobox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@majordomo.pobox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!