[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RO unit
Micheal writes:
> Can someone give me the run down on RO vs Deionized? I am contemplating
> purchasing an RO unit from Debron Aquatics. They have a 50 gallon/day TFC
> for $160 or a Maxima 50/day for $230. Are these good prices? The Maxima
> has a deionization cart. attached, is it worth the extra $70? Thanks for
> any imput. I want to make my purchase within the next few days.
RO, or reverse osmosis operates by forcing water through a membrane that is
selectively permeable only to water. It isn't perfect, but darn near. Water
purity is very high. The two biggest drawbacks are that the membrane is
somewhat delicate, and you discharge a certain amount of "waste water", which
contains all the stuff that didn't go through the membrane. If you lived in
a semi-arid, or arid location, like most Western US states (including
southern CA) I don't consider this an environmentally responsible option,
unless you find some way to utilize the waste water. Some folks in LA don't
seem to care that one of the hugest civil engineering projects ever
undertaken was the diversion of the vast majority of the Colorado River to
fill their growing demands. They further don't care that they can't keep
stealing water from everyone else around, because we want some, too. And for
that matter so do the fish, birds, lizards, etc.
De-Ionization uses specially selected chemicals, usually refered to as
resins, to replace all positive metallic ions, such as Ca++, Na+, Mg++, etc,
with an appropriate number of H+ ions. Then it also replaces negative ions,
such as CO3 --, Cl -, PO4 --, etc with OH- ions. The replaced ions are
trapped in the resins, and the H+ and OH-ions join up to form H2O. Its
biggest drawback is that you have to replace or recharge the ions
periodically. It has no waste water discharge, and is therefore more
environmentally friendly in dry climes.
RO maintenance is generally simpler, but DI costs less for the water you use.
The cost of recharging ions is about the same per gallon as the cost of
replacing the membrane and other stuff. The DI recharging chemicals are
somewhat dangerous, but the safe handling procedures are easy to learn and
follow. You should be comfortable with them, or replace the resins as needed.
DI only removes stuff that is in ionic solution. RO gets other stuff as
well, but it isn't perfect at getting all the ionic stuff. That's why some
RO units have DI afterwards.
Some products sold as de-ionizers are actually just water softeners. The
replace hard ions, like Ca++ with Na+, but don't really achieve the end you
are looking for. Question everything.
In Kentucky, you don't currently have a water shortage, nor are you likely to
soon. I would say the choice of RO or DI is pretty much up to you. The
output products and cost of operation long-term are about equal. Again, when
you go to the store to get it, question everything.
Bob Dixon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com.
For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help,
email apisto-request@listbox.com.
Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!