Yea, what he said!! Ed Pon writes: > I don't believe in the bad parenting gene because I believe that the > bad gene should have been bred out by evolution. Bad parents wouldn't pass > on their genes so most parents should be fish should be naturally good > parents having their good parenting characteristics "fixed". > > Dr Ron Coleman at UC Berkeley in California conducted some experiments and > gave a talk at the Pacific Coast Cichlid Associaton a couple of years ago > about his findings on the cichlid proclivity for eating their eggs. From > what little I recall, his study was done on some riverine cichlid. Dr > Coleman's research seemed to indicate that when conditions were better for > raising fry to adulthood, the parents were more likely to expend the energy > to raise the fry. When conditons make the expenditure energy to raise fry > to adulthood less likely to "pay off", then the eggs (energy) was consumed > by the parents. Larger quantities of eggs increases the likelihood of the > parents passing on their genes to the future generations, and as such, the > research figures indicated the the likelihood that the parents will raise > the fry increased. > > I believe that dwarf cichlids are less likely to eat their eggs if they feel > > they are more able to hide the fry from predators--this translates into > tanks that have heavy plant growth, lots of hiding places, and not very many > > disturbances--as in understocked tanks. The tendency to raise small > cichlids in small, very clean (bare) tanks may actually contribute to the > egg-eating behavior that's often seen in dwarf cichlids and discus. Just my > > two cents worth. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!