No problem, I think I was the one that missed your point. Walt -----Original Message----- From: Frauley/Elson <fraulels@minet.ca> To: apisto@majordomo.pobox.com <apisto@majordomo.pobox.com> Date: Monday, November 15, 1999 6:01 PM Subject: Re: Newbie question >Erik Olson wrote: >> >> I think he was saying they are not good cichlids for beginners, as opposed >> to not being cichlids at all. Yeah "Rams are not cichlids to start up >> with" is kind of ambiguous. >> >> - Erik >> >> On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Walter McCree wrote: >> >> > but still a cichlid. >Sorry Walter - missed your point completely. Thought it was a weird list >question, but I thought I'd be polite. I've got to watch the use of >two-word verbs. There must be a regional usage problem between 'to start >with' and 'to start up with'. > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. >For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, >email apisto-request@listbox.com. >Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"! ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is the apistogramma mailing list, apisto@listbox.com. For instructions on how to subscribe or unsubscribe or get help, email apisto-request@listbox.com. Search http://altavista.digital.com for "Apistogramma Mailing List Archives"!