[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [GSAS-board] plant auctopsy 2005
- To: Greater Seattle Aquarium Society board members <gsas-board@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [GSAS-board] plant auctopsy 2005
- From: Bob and Judy Holmes <jbholmes@nwlink.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 13:51:20 -0800
Thanks Erik!
Yes, it was the smoothest auction I can remember.
For the general auction in April, which tends to be a little more chaotic,
maybe we should get an earlier start for both setup and auction start - say
5:00 & 7:00? Or, if we can limit the number of lots to around 250, we could
just start setting up a little earlier.
I was delighted that the facility worked out so well for the auction. We'll
probably have to make slightly different arrangements for April, like
extending the staging area into the classroom and displaying the
merchandise differently. Clay had some good ideas there.
Susan, Here's what we owe ANW: Plants (invoice # 0201986-IN, order #
0165396) $326.40
Bogwood (invoice
0201985-IN, order # 0165356) 146.45
________
Total
472.85
Here's their address: African Northwest, Inc.
470 S. Kenyon St.
Seattle, WA. 98126
attn: Allen
Bob
At 09:51 AM 2/9/2005 -0800, you wrote:
OK, here's the annual "morning after" report. First, the numbers:
2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000
bidders 39 43 30 34 39 38
lots 242 322 264 259 231 260
gross $ 1299 1636 1327 1180 1624 1479
splits $ 194 453 265 150 403 413
This is right in line with previous years... not nearly as crazy as last
year in terms of numbers of items sold, which I consider a good thing (see
below).
Actually, I think the net to the club will turn out to be about the
same. Items went for less money last year (probably more duplicates, and
people flagging out by the end).
The computer says that Steev is owed $19.20 for his split -- not sure if
that was given to him already.
So what worked? As far as I'm concerned, EVERYTHING worked. This was the
smoothest auction I've experienced. Having four auctioneers was a treat.
Having four working conputers (Thanks Paul!) was excellent. Paul also
helped me set up the computers, so we were able to check in sellers very
smoothly. Once the auction started, everyone running the machines found
their footing. Items were moved swiftly, far fewer stalls than most
auctions. But more importantly, it was FUN, something missing from a lot
of the auctions when we're so worried about getting everything out by 10.
I didn't hear of any major discrepancies in what was bought and what was
picked up, except for that one guy who said we undercharged by a buck. The
software was unchanged from last year's. Checkout seemed good too.
OK, there were a few things that could be improved. The printer (gak).
Didn't get a chance to do the usual level of testing, as I didn't have
paper. This will be fixed by April. Actually, it's fixed today. :)
Another mistake *I* made was using the same file for producing the pink
and white labels. Normally the pink labels start at 1000, while the white
labels start at 2000. Oops. This too will be fixed by April.
Judy was busy making labels for the bag staging area. I will try to
remember to make two sets of cards, one for the staging area, next time.
Excellent job everyone!
- Erik
--
Erik Olson
erik at thekrib dot com
_______________________________________________
GSAS-board mailing list
GSAS-board@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board
_______________________________________________
GSAS-board mailing list
GSAS-board@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/gsas-board