At 12:24 PM 7/15/99 -0500, you wrote: >Karen wrote, in response to a suggestion that a series of detail shots might >be submitted: > >>Again, acknowledging that people _could_ cheat if they wanted to, I think >>that only "whole" tanks should be entered. > >While I might agree that we could stipulate that an overall shot of the >aquascape is required, I would be hesitant to limit someone's creativity by >ruling out the inclusion of detail shots showing "features" the entrant >thinks are worthy. Inclusion, remember? We are interpreting this different ways. I am not suggesting that people should be prohibitted from submitting photos that show only one section of a tank at a time. (for instance, I made mention of Neils' nice 6' tank that you can't get far enough away from to photograph the entire tank without a fisheye lens) I'm saying that people should not be allowed to decide that _just_ one end of their 6' tank will be one entry, while the other end will be a separate entry. Up to whatever maximum # of photos per tank that Erik feels he can handle comfortably, I think people should be able to compose those shots to show their tank to the best advantage. On the low end, if someone has a tank built into a wall, and has only a fixed focal length camera, it is concievable that they could best represent their tank with a single shot. In that case, that should be acceptable too... we don't really need to put 3 nearly identical photos up on the web just because people _must_ submit 3 photos of the tank. Karen ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@aquatic-gardeners.org with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest