On Sat, 17 Jul 1999, James Purchase wrote: > 1. The focus is on Aquascaping, not art, craft, or technical wizardry with a > camera. Aquascaping is an intentional act and it seems to me that it must be either art or craft (or both). What else is there? I draw a line (indistinct, perhaps) between gardening, aquascaping, and accidents. I have no problem with items 2 and 3. > 4. The event is to be designed and executed in such a manner that > _everyone_, regardless of approach to the hobby, years of experience, or > level of skill, feels threatened or excluded. > 5. Nothing which excludes a large portion of our audience is acceptable > (except of course we have to accept the fact that this is Web based). First, I'm afraid that you can't have a competition without excluding someone. Someone wins, someone does not. Second, when you get to the point where building a good aquascape is your priority in the hobby it means that you've already passed a few other milestones. That means that an aquascaping showcase and competition is for aquarists who have already made those first steps. > 6. This is a FUN hobby. This should be a FUN showcase and competition. FUN is fine, but can we keep CHALLENGING and REWARDING, too? Roger ------------------ To unsubscribe from this list, e-mail majordomo@aquatic-gardeners.org with "unsubscribe aga-contest" in the body of the message. To subscribe to the digest version, add "subscribe aga-contest-digest" in the same message. Old messages are available at http://lists.thekrib.com/aga-contest