Folks, Every year the AGA contest is followed by a round of discussion that features a lot of complaints and second guessing. That is unavoidable, but this year things seemed to be even more rancorous then in the preceding years. The judges' comments and lack of other information about the results often seem to play key roles in the complaints. It's difficult for the judges to make comments on every entry, the comments they make are probably never adequate to explain their placement, the comments are often off-base and frequently wrong. Generally, it is impossible to avoid mistakes in comments when the comments are based entirely on photographs. Unfortunately, for all entrants except the top three in each category the contest provides no result or information other than judge's comments. The AGA contest would be a better contest if we de-emphasized the judge's comments and provided the contestants with more information about the placement of their entries. I suggest that judge's comments should be solicited only after the contest placements are known and that only the top few finishers in each category should receive comments. At a minimum AGA should tell all of the contestants where their entry finished in the rankings. It would be even better if AGA provided a summary of the scores by category. There are several ways to handle the judge's comments and different ways to provide the contestants with more information. I think the way it's done now needs to be changed and the right time to discuss the questions is now while interest is relatively high. Roger Miller _______________________________________________ AGA-Contest mailing list AGA-Contest@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest