It is most definitely not a mistake. I don't want to influence the judges (half of whom are on this list now), but the tank background is strikingly different between the two, like day and night, and the title is "blah blah tank Version 1.0" and "blah blah tank Version 2.0". The description is identical. Clearly they are trying to have the same tank, with two different backgrounds, judged as two separate entities. - Erik On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Cheryl Rogers wrote: > It *might* be a simple mistake, like uploading from the wrong folder. I > would give him the opportunity to correct it, then what Scott said. > > Cheryl > > Erik Olson wrote: >> You guys must be doing something right... I don't think we've ever had >> this much early participation. >> >> Got the first controversy of the year today. One of the contestants has >> entered the exact same tank, but with the background changed, as two >> separate entries. I can tell it's the exact same tank because the plants >> are in precisely the same location. Literally just a background swap, one >> film for another. What do you think? >> >> * Force it to be evaluated as a single entry, cutting down the total of >> 9 photos to 5? >> >> * Evaluate as two separate entries? >> >> * Evaluate as two separate entries but only allow one to win? >> >> * Go back to the entrant and ask them to resubmit? >> >> >> - Erik >> >> > _______________________________________________ > AGA-Contest mailing list > AGA-Contest@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest > -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ AGA-Contest mailing list AGA-Contest@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest