I can e-mail the person. I have another unrelated question about their entry to ask them anyway. - Erik On Wed, 8 Aug 2007, Bailin Shaw wrote: > I had the same thoughts, but you put them into word much more eloquently > than I ever could have. Erik, would you like to let the person know or > would you like me to address this issue? > > Bailin > > >> From: "Karen Randall" <krandall@rdrcpa.biz> >> Reply-To: AGA Aquascaping Contest Planning <aga-contest@thekrib.com> >> To: <aga-contest@thekrib.com> >> Subject: Re: [AGA-Contest] AGA-Contest Digest, Vol 26, Issue 3 >> Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:10:37 -0400 >> >> >>> Message: 1 >>> Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 19:58:29 -0700 (PDT) >>> From: Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> >>> Subject: [AGA-Contest] up to 38 entries with photos >>> To: aga-contest@thekrib.com >>> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708071950380.12935@pulcher.thekrib.com> >>> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed >>> >>> You guys must be doing something right... I don't think we've ever had >>> this much early participation. >>> >>> Got the first controversy of the year today. One of the contestants has >>> entered the exact same tank, but with the background changed, as two >>> separate entries. I can tell it's the exact same tank because the >> plants >>> are in precisely the same location. Literally just a background swap, >> one >>> film for another. What do you think? >>> >>> * Force it to be evaluated as a single entry, cutting down the total >> of >>> 9 photos to 5? >>> >>> * Evaluate as two separate entries? >>> >>> * Evaluate as two separate entries but only allow one to win? >>> >>> * Go back to the entrant and ask them to resubmit? >>> >>> >>> - Erik >> >> The only problem of Scott's idea of having the discretion in "same tank" >> issues be with the judges, is that up until now the judges have had no >> contact with each other until the bulk of the judging is completed. What >> if >> some of the judges notice, and another doesn't? (and, having been on all of >> the judging teams, there are one or two judges I have no confidence WOULD >> have noticed<g>) >> >> In this case, I think I'd suggest someone talking to him politely and >> seeing >> if he'd willingly withdraw one entry. (maybe suggesting Scott's possibility >> that he could weaken his own chance of winning) If he insisted on keeping >> both entries in, I'd make sure for this year that all of the judges knew >> about it ahead of time (since some of us already do) and let it go. >> >> I agree that it makes sense to add some wording to the rules for next year >> to try to prevent a recurrence. Sure it's open to interpretation, so just >> make it clear up-front, who has the final decision-making authority. >> Suggest that if a person is unsure whether two entries might be too >> similar, >> that they run it by the committee chair ahead of time. In photography >> contests, the final decision on entries that are too similar (such as the >> same view shot vertically then horizontally) is with the show committee >> chairman. I think that's a better place to put the decision than the >> judges. I don't think any particular tank should be called to the judges' >> attention for good or for bad before the actual judging starts. >> >> That's one judge's perspective on the issue.<g> >> >> Karen >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> AGA-Contest mailing list >> AGA-Contest@thekrib.com >> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest > > _________________________________________________________________ > Learn.Laugh.Share. Reallivemoms is right place! > http://www.reallivemoms.com?ocid=TXT_TAGHM&loc=us > > _______________________________________________ > AGA-Contest mailing list > AGA-Contest@thekrib.com > http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest > -- Erik Olson erik at thekrib dot com _______________________________________________ AGA-Contest mailing list AGA-Contest@thekrib.com http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-contest