Re: PAM

[krandall@world.std.com]

At 09:47 AM 9/16/99 -0700, Dave Gomberg wrote:
>I pretty much second what Karen said below except that I would like the
>scientific level to approach that of Ichthyologica (which SFAS published
>when the IRS told them to burn $1M) where the science articles are
>concerned.   Of course the beginner and tips articles would be more
>hobbyist oriented.

I have not seen Ichthyologica, so I can't even begin to comment.  I'm also
not sure who you'll get to write this sort of stuff, and write it in a way
that it doesn't read like a peer-reviewed scientific journal, but something
of use to aquatic gardeners as opposed to aquatic botanists.  But I
certainly wouldn't reject the idea out of hand.

Just be aware, that for a while, TAG was getting the reputation of being
over the heads of the majority of our members.  We've tried hard to include
more hobby-level stuff because of this.

Karen