to solve the multiple Dave/David problems please refer to me as "Lass" Lass ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert P. Cashin <rcashin@juno.com> To: <aga-mcm@thekrib.com> Sent: Monday, November 15, 1999 9:19 AM Subject: Re: MCM - Digest V1 #177 > Hi Everybody, > > >Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 07:55:31 -0500 > >From: Neil Frank <nfrank@mindspring.com> > >Subject: votes > > > > [as I said in my earlier message, YES should not mean that we > >necessarily > >agree to ACCEPT the terms... only to DEFINE them. Some of the terms > >may be > >conditional and among other things can say that we wait a while before > >AGA > >decides. If Bob agrees to adopt this modification, then the MC should > >have > >the ability to resubmit their votes. In general, calls for votes > >should > >have a second, a chance for amendment, discussion and then a vote. We > >all > >know that would take too long in our email forum, so can we be > >flexible here.] > > Yes, I agree to this modification and had understood it this way all > along. Remember, I said " Don't stop the negotiations, Dave L because we > can always vote no on the proposal when it comes" Thanks for waiving the > discussion and second on this but I will remember in the future. MC, > please re vote on the modification. > > Incidentally, Neil, we are still here. <VBG> > > How did the printers respond to you? Did they get the next pub in the > mail? Have they sent out a bill yet? > > For those of you who haven't voted yet, please do so ASAP. What I > expected to do on the time of response issue was either pick an average > of the responses, or select a few that seemed popular and put them back > for a final vote, so include some discussion with your response on this > issue. > > I'd also like to remind everybody to delete everything that is not > relevant to your reply so the rest of us don't have to plow thru stuff > we've already read, risking to possibility that we will skip something > pertinent when we are fast forwarding thru old material. There was a fair > amount of it in the last posting. > > Steve Dixon responded to my inquiry. Basically he declined because it is > not an area in which he has expertise. He did volunteer to review the > contract but also indicated a possible conflict of interest, so I > declined his offer. He expressed some thoughts on incorporation which I > am copying here for information purposes. The SC was copied on his reply, > so if I missed something which seemed pertinent, please feel free to add > it. > > Here is the quote from Steve > > My first question is, has AGA really figured out whether it needs to > incorporate as a 501(c)iii corporation? 10 years or so ago I looked into > this for one of the charitable activities of my company and the only > reason > I came up with was the tax deductibility of the contributions, or dues in > AGA's case. Even if the annual dues were tax deductible, the fair market > value of TAG or PAM would have to be subtracted from the dues to get the > amount of the charitable deduction. How important is this issue for the > members? > > As you may know, there is annual reporting and tax returns to file if the > group is incorporated. I don't honestly know if this amounts to much > (perhaps Karen's husband would know), but its something to consider. > > End of quote. > > He volunteered to chat with me about the AGA and I am trying to arrange > a convenient time to do it. If anybody else is interested in calling, my > phone number is 814-838-6380 and I live in Erie, Pa which is in the > Eastern time zone. > > So far there has been no no votes on Bob McCaw. I suspect we will have > two Bobs in the loop soon so please refer to me as Bob C and him as Bob M > to avoid confusion. I already have to think twice when we are talking > about Dave ( L or G? ) > > That's it for now, Bob C. > > > > ___________________________________________________________________ > Get the Internet just the way you want it. > Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! > Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj. >