[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Index by Month]
Re: [AGA-mcm] new year, new archive password, etc
- To: AGA Advisory Committee <aga-mcm@thekrib.com>
- Subject: Re: [AGA-mcm] new year, new archive password, etc
- From: "S. Hieber" <shieber@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 12:36:26 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=O1Y0x6z6cQY8ytEvrbDaemEn8r4JNbBJ3ASLA6lJu+uGUq0RVLXG8w3XQDYuDcD+iZPrtnyxn8gWaUXNJ7lEGwmc8I26ub/ZZbP3C2pr2bFlcqH1QfG/SjrkB+hY5yTCMiVLIDnsvv+imKZrC6xz3+a+p6YdIgF2PEO/ELSpHqs= ;
Well, if someone sends the raw data, I'll put it on the
beany and see if the propeller spins.
sh
--- Erik Olson <erik@thekrib.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, S. Hieber wrote:
>
> >> http://www.aquatic-gardeners.org/TAGIndex/issues.html
> >
> > Since 1990, we've done at least three issues per year.
> I
> > thought the track record was worse than that.
>
> Guess it's a matter of perspective. Until 2000 there
> were supposed to be
> six issues per year. There were two particularly bad
> years. Neil's last
> year was the first, when V12 #1 was a quadruple-size
> issue that came out 9
> months after the previous issue. The second was V14#3,
> a.k.a., "Erik's
> lone TAG edit" which came out nearly a year after the
> previous one.
>
> Aside from that, the AGA has been very much on time.
>
> >> We
> >> should probably revisit whether we're charging
> >> appropriately.
> >
> > Are you thinking higher or lower?
>
> I'm thinking "we should make sure that the postage isn't
> costing us more
> than we're bringing in with foreign memberships".
>
> - Erik
>
> --
> Erik Olson
> erik at thekrib dot com
> _______________________________________________
> AGA-mcm mailing list
> AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
> http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm
>
_______________________________________________
AGA-mcm mailing list
AGA-mcm@thekrib.com
http://lists.thekrib.com/mailman/listinfo/aga-mcm